Owing to many rotations of obscure personalities in power of European and American countries, a terrible loss of reality had been in progress - the ideology of appeasement had reigned for the last three decades and it had not altered even during the significant rise in the threats. The second coincidence is connected with the peak of the era of well-being in the camp of developed, democratic states.

Worst of all, we were weakening and refused to prioritize the growth of power even at the start of Putin's aggression in 2014, encouraging him to launch a new, much larger, attack aimed at swallowing up the state. The first, the most important one, was that we had taken the liberty of becoming an easy prey, a model target. The Ukrainian war for an independent state arose against the background of several coincidences. It is almost certain to say that if Putin had once read Erich Fromm or Viktor Frankl, he would not have been stuck in the Middle Ages, and there would not have been a terrible war between Russia and Ukraine in the 21st century. Issues of the formation of personality are of great importance here, and the fact that the current blasphemer of Ukraine was not Lodi in his childhood (that was the name of another Volodymyr Volodymyrovych, Nabokov, - the author) and did not have a hierarchy of ideals in his youth in the form of 'Father, Jesus, Bach, Goethe' (such a hierarchy was held by Albert Schweitzer, who at the end of his life was called the 'thirteenth apostle' – the author), tangibly contributed to the fact that he confidently joined the ranks of murderers and criminals, dishonoring all human values. One way or another, any great war has to do with a specific personality: both the Livonian War of Ivan IV, and the Northern War of Peter I with Sweden, and Hussein's invasion of the oil fields of Iran, as well as the use of chemical weapons against the inhabitants of Halabja - these are all stories about the establishment of a personal dictatorship. All of these people were distinguished from others by their great mediocrity of thinking, obsessive ideas about unlimited autocratic power, hence the bloody format of self-realization.

In this context, Tsar Ivan IV of Moscow, Peter I, Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Putin stand in the same row. These are paranoid individuals who never stop. Herostratus, when they suddenly gain power, act in the same way: they follow the path of the greatest destruction of existence, considering it an extension of influence, so that they would be remembered. It is worth adding that a great war occurs mostly under conditions when the thirst for power captivates primitive minds, infected with many complexes, incapable of reaching higher levels of self-realization.ĪPPEASEMENT FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE OR PRIORITY OF STRENGTH It is about the banal intense desire for power, inherent in all living beings, which manifests itself under the conditions of finding an easy prey. Friedrich Nietzsche had rightly added the answer to this question in one of his famous quotes: 'Both the strongest and the weakest - all seek one thing: to spread their power as far as possible.' It is worth acceding to this thesis, as the psychological paradigm of any war is the same. According to historians, all wars of the humankind are similar, but at the same time they are completely different.

Seashore early childhood academy